As argued by
Lauren Schrager, the townspeople of Oran are not afraid of the plague and are
still concerned with their “individualistic pursuits”. Nevertheless, I beg to
differ. In this section, the individuals of Oran are demonstrating a wide
spread panic: the population is beginning to realize that the fever has lasted
longer than thought.
Author,
Albert Camus, clearly identifies the townspeople’s sheer anxiety when he notes
that, “in normal times the townsfolk of Oran are not particularly devout,” (85)
and somehow almost all inhabitants have attended Oran’s “Week of Prayer” and
“Weekly Sermon”- religious attempts to resist the plague. In this section, the
audience senses a sudden shift in Oran’s people: their newfound trust in God
and religion, forcing them to neglect their previous self-interested character.
The townspeople’s actions are not surprising however, because it is generally
known that many individuals turn to religion during difficult times in their
life. Nonetheless, shortly after, the individuals undergo a sudden change in
character when they begin believing that there is no way out of this
plague-infested environment.
Camus
begins referring to the townspeople as “prisoners” (101) because they are
beginning to behave as individuals who are begin punished for a crime. Camus
explains that, “some fellow citizens were losing their heads” (97). He later
explained that he knew this because there had been scenes of violence’s against
public officials and night attempts to, “elude the sentries and escape the
outside world,” (97). It is evident that the townspeople of Oran rather face
persecution for escaping then conform to living a monotonous life.
No comments:
Post a Comment